Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Condorman
To clarify, Indianapolis Man was originally classified as Baltimore Man. This error was corrected in 1984.

Fffft, you evos just make this up as you go along. First it's Indianapolis Man evolved from Baltimore Man, now it's the other way around. Can't you silly evos make up your mind.

Oh, and if your theories are true where are all the transitionals like half Indianapolis Man and half Baltimore Man?

I mean has anyone ever witnessed a Baltimore Man turn into an Indianapolis Man?
Or better yet, has a Baltimore Man ever given birth to an Indianapolis Man?
No? Well, I thought as much.

437 posted on 01/24/2006 1:35:39 PM PST by BMCDA (cdesign proponentsists - the missing link)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]


To: BMCDA
What you fail to realize is that science is self-correcting.

Take for example, the picture on the cover of this 1938 issue of Life Magazine. This specimen was briefly listed as an early Pittsburgh Man. However, famed trader of the day George Halas realized that the specimen in question would be a much better fit as Chicago Man, and acquired him in 1939. Note the primitive head covering, as compared to what we now call Pittsburgh Man.

442 posted on 01/24/2006 2:06:36 PM PST by Condorman (Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

To: BMCDA
I mean has anyone ever witnessed a Baltimore Man turn into an Indianapolis Man?

As a former Baltimore Colt fan, let me just say ... don't get me started.

476 posted on 01/24/2006 4:51:00 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson