I've expressed my opinions and ideas and at times facts - or what I believed at the time to be facts - that I have read in this FR threads.
And when those "facts" were instantly debunked - by creationist sites no less - you didn't back down, you insisted that those lies were true.
If I state something as fact and the experts in these evolution threads believe that it is not, then please do correct me.
We have. You kept repeating the lies.
If there is a divergence of opinions as what constitutes a fact, then I tend to research the issue on my own, but may not conclusively say for sure whether what I have arrived at is indeed a fact or a supposition.
All of which is a fancy way of trying to distance yourself from the lies you continued to spread even after they were shown to be false, without actually admitting that they were false.
Cute.
I'm not a scientist and hope this clear up any misunderstanding and me. (sic)
We're still waiting for you to acknowledge that you took a quote out of context and attributed it to Darwin to back up a false statement. All you need to do is admit that you were wrong, that Darwin did not say that in 377 that "Darwin wrote that blacks were very closely related to their ape ancestors, but there was a group that was even closer- the Irish."
Are you ever going to admit that you were wrong, or will you persist with your course that you "believed (these lies) at the time to be facts"?
I did not make post #377.
I think you meant to respond to the poster of 377.
highball,
I did not make post 377 that you attribute to me. You should have post 426 retracted by the Moderator. That's an insult to me.