Yes, fine point. An evolutionist sometimes acts like a baby distracted by a set of car keys-- they fail to see that yes, there is life in the universe, but also simpler things that are just as advanced. Take the most basic- the building blocks of the universe- time space matter and energy. That these simple things obey laws- to me, that is simply amazing. God actually designed tiny little particles that somehow behave the same way every time. They obey laws- they have no choice. Amazing. Put a gas into a fixed volume- increase the temp or pressure, and the gas will respond predictably every time.
And the day someone can explain what light is, or what a dimension is, or these "simple" things that no scientist can give you a straight answer on, then they can move up to more advanced designs.
Fixed your typo.
"That these simple things obey laws- to me, that is simply amazing. God actually designed tiny little particles that somehow behave the same way every time. They obey laws- they have no choice. Amazing."
Those "God's laws" fail in the quantum level. Not so amazing, is it?
"They obey laws- they have no choice. Amazing. Put a gas into a fixed volume- increase the temp or pressure, and the gas will respond predictably every time.
They obey 'laws'? Who created those laws? You are aware that we, meaning humans, apply the word 'law' to observations that are observably consistent? There is no magic in the anthropomorphization of this consistency by our naming them as 'laws'. In other words, the consistency is observed first, then we describe them mathematically and call them laws simply to give us a sense of that consistency. We could have called them 'blauplant' in which case your astonishment would have been less severe and more realistic.