[StACase]

Why does it always come down to sex with you people?

I asked myself the question, "Why do the liberals want to claim Bonobos as our closest reletive on the tree of evolution?" and that's what I come up with. I know they are not our closest relative, see the analogies I've posted, so I know the DNA studies are most likely fudged in order to fit a preconceived hypothesis.

[Dimensio]

I asked myself the question, "Why do the liberals want to claim Bonobos as our closest reletive on the tree of evolution?" and that's what I come up with.

Far be it from you to actually look at the evidence. No, it's much easier to assume a liberal conspiracy amongst the world's biologists and throw out anything that they present without examination.

I know they are not our closest relative, see the analogies I've posted,

And your analogy ignores the basis for declaring relation.

so I know the DNA studies are most likely fudged in order to fit a preconceived hypothesis.

Yes, you "know" it, but you won't actually look at the studies so that you can point out how they are flawed.

[Oztrich Boy]

You need more knowlegable and less dishonest sources of informnation

. I know they are not our closest relative, see the analogies I've posted, so I know the DNA studies are most likely fudged in order to fit a preconceived hypothesis.

Just like you "liberals" knew the Mapes Memos were genuine and not forged, so all the font studies done by the bushbots were most likely fudged in order to fit a reconceived hypothesis.

I'm sorry, but you are a "liberal", living by your "hopes and feelings".