[mbraynard]

"Good. That means easier targeting."

That's so callous. Children no no better.

No, I think you are misunderstanding the parent poster. He means that the sites that they have put children around indicate they may be more valuable than sites they haven't children around.

However, I doubt that is the case and it is more likely a desception as they would let no cameras broadcast anything of their most valuable sites.

[AlGone2001]

No, I think you are misunderstanding the parent poster. He means that the sites that they have put children around indicate they may be more valuable than sites they haven't children around.

---

Really......?

Then why was that post removed?

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

---

That post stated that the children increased our targets.  So tell me.  Did I misunderstand?