[8mmMauser]

You seem like a reasonable and well meaning person. Also, I was at Hanford, too, 1970, so we share some background.

You mention the rift on FR and wonder why, so maybe I can help.

In simple terms, some seek the truth whatever it is and others are content to accepting what is comfortable.

First, you quote as truisms all that the media wants you to believe. Most all is wrong. The people who take our side do so with the truth, evidence, and personal witness the media refused to accept.

To put it bluntly, Terri was murdered in a slow process allowed by corrupt and complicit politics and media.

When they started the exit protocol of slow dehydration to kill her over thirteen days, Terri was alive, alert and remarkably healthy and was aware, despite the screams of the detractors that she was not. Many freepers were on the scene and can attest to those truths.

The media picked up very little of the truths and parroted the other side, passing out kool aid for all.

If you are as open minded as you say, you should take a look at our Terri monthly threads, the latest one linked by me above. You will have all the access and references to what actually happened.

It is understandable you picked up the impression the media wanted you to pick up, and that is in part why many months later, we keep the Legacy of Terri alive, to wake people up to what actually happened.

Regards

8mm

[robertpaulsen]

"Terri was alive ..."

Her body was being kept alive by an artificial, surgically implanted feeding tube, without which she would have died.

... alert ..."

What? Where's your proof of that? A bomb could've gone off and she wouldn't have known it.

"... and remarkably healthy ..."

Yes. Michael took good care of her.

"... and was aware."

Of the five senses, she had ... none.

[ContraryMary]

The people who take our side do so with the truth, evidence, and personal witness the media refused to accept.

Sorry, but that's just not correct. Most of the distortions have come from those who would take your position.