Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul C. Jesup
How, exactly, does the worries of a few paranoid men that don't have common sense enough to marry the right woman for the right reasons threaten marriage as an institution?

Furthermore, what does that red herring have to do with your assertion that you are the only one that thought of the propaganda that divorce is a greater threat to marriage as an institution than same sex perverted marriage (a pre- canned very popular argument applied liberally by homosexual advocates and activists world wide) A.K.A Homosexuality?

My point is you have more than once thrown your hat in the ring and are advocating homosexuality here on FreeRepublic.com contrary to the goals of this forum.

I have kept track of your homosexualisim advocacy here on this forum and will continue to do so.

Regards!

68 posted on 01/22/2006 10:47:19 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Silence is a good fence for wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: DirtyHarryY2K
Paul Cousins: There are several men on FR (let alone the rest of the country) who have stated that they are not going to get married because they did want to risk becoming a financial slave for the next 20 years to their (ex)wife because of sexist/anti-male divorse court rulings.

DirtyHarryY2K: How, exactly, does the worries of a few paranoid men that don't have common sense enough to marry the right woman for the right reasons threaten marriage as an institution?

Sir, are you accusing the younger, single, intelligent men of FR of lacking "common sense" and being "paranoid" on the issue marriage?

69 posted on 01/22/2006 10:56:13 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson