Skip to comments.
Activists Seek to Evict Souter From Home
Sun Sentinel ^
| January 21 2006
| KATHY McCORMACK
Posted on 01/21/2006 7:09:56 AM PST by beaversmom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: beaversmom
This story just makes my day. Thanks.
2
posted on
01/21/2006 7:15:40 AM PST
by
kjo
To: beaversmom
Bump - I wish this would happen.
3
posted on
01/21/2006 7:16:09 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: beaversmom
4
posted on
01/21/2006 7:17:31 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
("You should move the team Art" - then Governor Voinovich)
To: AD from SpringBay
I wish it would happen to four more people in addition to Souter.
5
posted on
01/21/2006 7:18:11 AM PST
by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: beaversmom
I don't know if this is a strong enough message, but something has to be done to reverse the direction of the courts.
6
posted on
01/21/2006 7:18:26 AM PST
by
econjack
To: beaversmom
I'd settle for impeaching his worthless carcass from the SCOTUS.
7
posted on
01/21/2006 7:20:54 AM PST
by
pissant
I'd like to ask GHWB just one question: "What were you thinking?"
To: pissant
I agree: he and the other five should be impeached, but it will never happen under this Congress. In fact, the popular Sandra Day O'Connor is going everywhere these days for ceremonies of honor on her behalf.
9
posted on
01/21/2006 7:23:07 AM PST
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: pissant
Yes, he needs to be impeached. Along with several others...bad behavior....opinions based on international law will do it.
10
posted on
01/21/2006 7:24:27 AM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: beaversmom
>>>"You don't go after a judge personally because you disagree with his judgments."<<<
Why not? Especially when his judgements are not grounded in reason, logic, justice or the US Constitution.
11
posted on
01/21/2006 7:26:06 AM PST
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: beaversmom
Someone, quick! Get the pitch forks!! LOL! Reminds me of the french revolution, where they did away with the King and beheaded Queen Antoinette! Bawahahhaha....I bet Souter ain't liking his own medicine!
To: beaversmom
"Most people here see this as an act of revenge and an improper attack on the judicial system," Kurk said.
"You don't go after a judge personally because you disagree with his judgments."I say it's about time for some tar and feathers under the Liberty Tree.
13
posted on
01/21/2006 7:35:44 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: RoseofTexas
14
posted on
01/21/2006 7:36:31 AM PST
by
Laserman
To: Theodore R.
The peel back of liberalism started by Reagan needs to be reinvigorated. GWB has done a fine job selecting Alito and Roberts. Let's hope that at least one more vacancy comes up within his term.
15
posted on
01/21/2006 7:38:18 AM PST
by
pissant
To: shield
Thank GOD both Roberts and Alito know that international law has NO place in our SCOTUS.
16
posted on
01/21/2006 7:39:08 AM PST
by
pissant
To: beaversmom
It is time to make those who try to impose restrictions on others live with what they want. Taking Souter's home is jsut a great first step, take all of the enviros that are protesting drilling for oil, take their vehicles away and shut off their utilities. See if they really want to live that way.
17
posted on
01/21/2006 7:41:14 AM PST
by
midwyf
(Eliminate government involvement in the enivronmental religion too.)
To: beaversmom
"You don't go after a judge personally because you disagree with his judgments."
Question... Why not? If someones independent action on this judge then has an effect on many judges, is that not the same as one judges independent decision having an effect on many people? I guess I need some clairification with that guys pre-supposition packed statement.
To: Theodore R.
"In fact, the popular Sandra Day O'Connor is going everywhere these days for ceremonies of honor on her behalf."
This is what Rush warned the '94 Republican House: "Don't get caught up in all the Washington Hoopla. They will never like a conservative --- they just want to use you!"
19
posted on
01/21/2006 7:43:06 AM PST
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: beaversmom
I'd like to ask GHWB just one question: "What were you thinking?" It's real simple--GHWB suffered from the same fatal disease that will probably cost the Republicans the election this fall--wanting to be bipartisan.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson