Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b_sharp

There were 4 posts because Free Republic went down last night. Maybe you weren't online at the time.

No, accepting micro evolution does NOT accept macro evolution. One does not necessarily lead to the other. The evo's believe it does. But that's based on faith not science.


313 posted on 01/20/2006 7:29:27 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk
"There were 4 posts because Free Republic went down last night. Maybe you weren't online at the time.

I thankfully missed that fun/frustration.

"No, accepting micro evolution does NOT accept macro evolution. One does not necessarily lead to the other. The evo's believe it does. But that's based on faith not science.

Actually your rejection of the affects of millions of years worth of cumulative changes is based on faith not science. Do you reject the idea of macro-deposition, the accumulation of detritus that can create a mountain out of a mole hill (or even a flat plain)?

324 posted on 01/20/2006 7:54:00 AM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson