[darkocean]

That's way too logical for the evolution crowd.

It's not "logical", it's limited thinking. It assumes that only additive processes can bring about new traits, when there's no reason to believe that subtractive processes could also bring about physical features.

That's even funnier than most evolution arguments. What all then do you need to cut off a chimpanzee or a monkey to turn him into a man? What do you cut off of some non-flying dinosaur to turn him into a bird?

[Dimensio]

That's even funnier than most evolution arguments.

Only by those who wish to ridicule rather than learn.

What all then do you need to cut off a chimpanzee or a monkey to turn him into a man?

Who said that anything on a monkey or chimpanzee could simply be "cut off" to produce a man?

You seem to again be playing with absolutes. I point out that Behe's arguments neglect subtractive processes, and suddenly you seem to think that I said that all evolution involves subtraction. Naturally you'll go with a false dichotomy rather than address reality.