Replies

LOL you are talking in circles, and have elevated this ideology housed in a claim labeled science as coming forth giving light.

Young earth is NOT Biblical, just as evolution is not science. Each ideology are opposite sides of the same coin and both traditions make what the Bible actually says null and void. See the Bible foretold of this coin from the beginning.

This earth as Written and described provides the evidence that this earth is NOT young, there is no need for evolutionary claims to date the earth. Evolutionary claims are to remove a Creator of man in the flesh, cause if it were to be acknowledge that a Creator did as was described then said Creator would have standing in how to live.

Further as is described in the Written Word from the beginning there are some who are NOT going to follow the Creator of their souls.

Citations HA quoting the Bible to you is like speaking to a deaf person or writing to one who is blind. YOu have decided what you want to believe and you have demonstrated that what ever it takes you will promote your belief system.

Young earth is NOT Biblical

I disagree. Not any different than some primitive counting systems - 1, 2, 3, many.

The historical evidence points to the belief in a young universe, centered on this world and specifically centered on man himself.

Only recently have we been able to truly view our place in this universe. BTW, not only our place, but also just how vast it really is and how "un-centered" we really are in the great scheme of things.

"LOL you are talking in circles, and have elevated this ideology housed in a claim labeled science as coming forth giving light."

You are accusing ME of talking in circles? lol

" Young earth is NOT Biblical,"

Yet it was the accepted position up until the late 1700's and early 1800's. THAT is all I have been saying; you made the claim that the idea of a young Earth came about during Darwin's time; this is demonstrably false. The opposite happened; people began to see the Earth as being far far older than they had thought. You have provided NO evidence to the contrary.

"This earth as Written and described provides the evidence that this earth is NOT young, there is no need for evolutionary claims to date the earth."

I never said there was. Who are you arguing with? I said that it was the accepted position that the Earth was very young up until the late 18th and early 19th centuries. That's a fact.

"Evolutionary claims are to remove a Creator of man in the flesh, cause if it were to be acknowledge that a Creator did as was described then said Creator would have standing in how to live."

That's a lie.

" Citations HA quoting the Bible to you is like speaking to a deaf person or writing to one who is blind."

In other words, you have no citations from the Bible saying the Earth is very very old. You're blowing smoke.

"YOu have decided what you want to believe and you have demonstrated that what ever it takes you will promote your belief system."

I have stated facts, and you have evaded answering my questions. Why can't you just admit that people thought the Earth was very young before the 19th century?