Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. Times caught in photo fakery,Pakistanis shown with 'missile'allegedly fired by U.S.
Worldnetdaily ^ | 1/17/06 | Worldnetdaily

Posted on 01/17/2006 6:54:45 AM PST by OPS4

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Mathews

Looks like a dud that was brought in from the Afgan front.
It sure was not fired from a drone.
OPs4 God Bless America!


21 posted on 01/17/2006 7:48:16 AM PST by OPS4 (worth repeating)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Sloppy captioning but so long as the picture was actually taken in the village, not 'fake'. Of course, we have to trust the NYT that it was the village....
22 posted on 01/17/2006 7:49:10 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut

I am sure the readers here would really trust the NY TIMES.
LOL!
OPS4 GOD BLESS AMERICA!


23 posted on 01/17/2006 7:50:45 AM PST by OPS4 (worth repeating)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Yup. You can see the grooves in the rotating band.


24 posted on 01/17/2006 7:51:53 AM PST by Mathews (Shot... Splash... Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Where do you go to see the picture, anyway?


25 posted on 01/17/2006 8:00:52 AM PST by Shery (S. H. in APOland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut

What struck me as odd was that the old guy modeling with the shell was wearing a large turban (India-like) rather than those small caps (OBL-style) like everyone else in the photo.


26 posted on 01/17/2006 8:04:59 AM PST by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
It was not the remains of a missile fired at a house...

What's more is that I don't think that the NYT/Getty photo was of 'a house' or 'the house' that was hit by the missle.

This is supposedly (according to CNN/AP) 'the house' struck by the missle. This photo is quite different from the NYT/ Getty image (which doesn't even appear to be 'a house'--no evidence of a roof or roof supports.)

27 posted on 01/17/2006 8:15:39 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery

You'll have to find it on another site as Getty will sue FR (but not other websites) if anyone posts their images here.


28 posted on 01/17/2006 8:17:53 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (Those Who Want to Impeach President Bush Are the Party of Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Shery

Link to NYT photo: http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/01/14/international/worldspecial/14cnd-afghan.ready.html


29 posted on 01/17/2006 8:19:10 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Thread from the 14th
30 posted on 01/17/2006 8:22:48 AM PST by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mathews

It's a 155.


31 posted on 01/17/2006 8:32:38 AM PST by elhombrelibre (MSM: de facto allies of America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

"The Times corrected the photo caption after Thomas Lifson, editor and publisher of The American Thinker brought attention to it."

Isn't the Times, just the best? And I'm sure the correction takes care of any unjustness that was initially done. They are such a moral, pro-American newspaper. They would never print anything that would harm the United States...


32 posted on 01/17/2006 8:37:14 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: OPS4

Huh..There was a freeper who posted that pic here a couple of days ago and said it was fake. And a few of us seemed to remember it from the old Afghan wedding bomb propaganda from a couple of years ago. But I can't find the thread now....
??


34 posted on 01/17/2006 8:46:12 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunTzuWu
In addition to it being an old stock photo, a freeper yesterday pointed out that the photos original file name indicated that the photo was taken in Afghanistan. In other words, it was "fake but accurate."

When I saw the photo here a couple of days ago, the first think that hit me was the kid. I thought he looked more like an Afghan, not an Iraqi. Look at the color of his hair and skin.

35 posted on 01/17/2006 9:16:14 AM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Caught again!


36 posted on 01/17/2006 9:19:26 AM PST by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

Because the pic was staged for the terrorist sympathizing media. Any half-baked fool can tell the difference between a rocket and an artillery round. Well, except for the LSM, that is.


37 posted on 01/17/2006 11:41:38 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WakeUpAndVote

Now there is a report that there were terrorist there, 4 were drug away to hide their identity....Put a reward out. "Bring us the bodies and we will give you 2000 goats." Money don't mean crap to these people.


38 posted on 01/17/2006 11:43:30 AM PST by Safetgiver (Noone spoke when the levee done broke, Blanco cried and Nagin lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

"Bring us the bodies and we will give you 2000 goats." Money don't mean crap to these people.

_____


Yeah! That would be better than the 72 virgins they are used to be getting...............


39 posted on 01/17/2006 11:52:03 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1992!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Yup... I was playing my war games last night and got stuck on 105mm. I meant 155mm (seriously).


40 posted on 01/17/2006 12:20:41 PM PST by Mathews (Shot... Splash... Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson