Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
there's really no Osirak-type resolution of the problem - a quick surgical strike, in and out. By most counts, there are upwards of a couple of hundred potential sites spread across a wide range of diverse terrain, from remote mountain fastnesses to residential suburbs.

Translation: there is no way to take out their nuke factories without collateral damage to civilians.

That is the Ayatollahs' choice not ours.

Only a direct and unambiguous message will do the job. Identify the probable largest such facility and destroy it, Along with all power generating facilities serving Teheran.

No positive response? Go on to the next pair of targets and see who runs out of resolve first.

All the hundreds of dispersed facilities don't have to be destroyed at the same time.
We can build all the missiles necessary faster than they can rebuild their veneer of civilization.

51 posted on 01/16/2006 6:58:15 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961

Qom should be the next target. Anybody who spells their city's name with a "Q" and no "u" should be erased post haste.


61 posted on 01/16/2006 7:26:10 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson