Replies

Pat is intelligent.

When sane, it's easy to see why he was once a mover in the party and movement. People that befriended him then still have some attachment.

This article is why Pat has become to us, what Gore has become to the Democrats. The difference is that Buchanon has been cut down by us for this nonsense in terms of influence, but the Democrats (not the Clinton's/mutual enemy list) still have use for Gore.

I used to look askance at people that labeled him an anti-semite or bigot. No longer, and not for quite some time. Be it Jews or Hispanics and, despite his attempt to use Arabs to make a point, Arabs in the M.E. Pat can always be depended to have an intense rejection of these peoples. Pat IS an isolationist, which does tend to mask these feelings, as the first can hide his sentiments to race or ethnity for awhile. Over the long term it becomes clear he's not just an isolationist, which is a position I can disagree with but that is not the same as ingrained prejudices.

Pat may be unaware that recent polls from reliable units have shown opinion starting to shift from lopsided American hostilities, with Osama/Zarqawi starting to register as disliked more. Instead he relies on Zogby, who has questionable ties to terroist sympathezers.

Equating FOX to al Jazeera is pathetic, discrediting him right at the start.

And if Pat wants to know why the numbers are so lopsided in non democracies toward Americans? It's because they are not free and spoon fed certain beliefs. No free Democracy registers numbers as lopsided as 90% that he cites. That's about as legit as saddam winning election with 99% of the vote.