Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
Let us not forget this man requested the private encryption keys to read that e-mail.
203 posted on 01/16/2006 9:26:12 AM PST by bmwcyle (As the left takes to the streets the too many lazy Freeper sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: bmwcyle

Absolutely!

And then "lost" all HIS emails, remember?


212 posted on 01/16/2006 9:27:13 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

To: bmwcyle; All

*****EVERYBODY, read this and bookmark it. It IS the fact!




Appeals panel rejects secret court's limits on terrorist wiretaps

From Terry Frieden

CNN

Tuesday, November 19, 2002 Posted: 1:24 AM EST (0624 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The United States has broad authority to use wiretaps and other surveillance techniques to hunt for suspected terrorists, a federal appeals court panel ruled Monday.

In a 56-page opinion overturning a May decision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the three-judge panel said the expanded wiretap guidelines sought by Attorney General John Ashcroft under the new USA Patriot Act law do not violate the Constitution. (More on the USA Patriot Act)

The ruling by the special panel from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia gives broad surveillance authority to counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism investigators to track individuals considered potential national security threats.

"Our case may well involve the most serious threat our country faces," the panel declared.

The reversal of May's decision by a federal judge represents a victory for the Justice Department and the FBI, which were harshly criticized by the lower court judge for its handling of wiretap applications, and their interpretation of the authority granted the government by the USA Patriot Act.

The ruling represents a setback to the American Civil Liberties Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, which had filed briefs opposing the government's position, but there was no immediate decision whether the case would be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.


http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/18/spy.court.ruling/


224 posted on 01/16/2006 9:28:47 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson