Skip to comments.
Feinstein Warns Against Alito Filibuster
The Columbian News ^
| 1/15/06
| Hope Yen
Posted on 01/15/2006 10:06:12 AM PST by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: LdSentinal
I don't understand the Democrat's tactic of delay. It gains them nothing.
2
posted on
01/15/2006 10:09:45 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
.........waiting for a miracle. Maybe he'll be found to be the long lost brother of Charles Manson.
I think it was O'Reilly that said they should just look at his rulings over the years and vote. The hearing and the rest is just so much political BS.
3
posted on
01/15/2006 10:11:35 AM PST
by
bigsigh
To: LdSentinal
"I do not see a likelihood of a filibuster," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "This might be a man I disagree with, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the court." She said she will not vote to confirm the appeals court judge, based on his conservative record. But she acknowledged that nothing emerged during last week's hearings to justify any organized action by Democrats to stall the nomination.
A new Democratic party dogma is about to be set in place as a new directive?
Go ahead Diane, smear him, his family, and the horse that tows their wagon!
Cut the stealth games and show us who you and the Democratic party really are.
I dare you.
4
posted on
01/15/2006 10:13:07 AM PST
by
EGPWS
To: bigsigh
The harm will come to the rats if they filibuster so I am all for it.
In all likelyhood Pres. Bush will get one more pick to SC.... if they filibuster over Alito that makes them look even more silly for the 3rd pick.
3rd pick on media will be THE VAST RIGHT WING SUPREME COURT 24/7 regardless.
5
posted on
01/15/2006 10:14:19 AM PST
by
alisasny
(<h3>"Watching Ted Kennedy is a nonintellectual feast."</h3>)
To: Dog Gone
I don't understand the Democrat's tactic of delay.Lately, it's all they have.
Does that help? ; )
6
posted on
01/15/2006 10:15:44 AM PST
by
EGPWS
To: alisasny
Who's your guess for the #3 vacancy ?
It must be pretty thick writing on the wall for the left if Feinstein is saying this.
7
posted on
01/15/2006 10:16:57 AM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Dog Gone
The only reason for the delay is an attempt to prevent Bush from welcoming Alito during the SOTU address.
Yes, it is just that petty in Washington.
8
posted on
01/15/2006 10:17:41 AM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Dog Gone
I don't understand the Democrat's tactic of delay. It gains them nothing.
-----
IMHO, it does -- it prevents Bush from being able to talk about Alito in the state of the union address.
9
posted on
01/15/2006 10:18:07 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: LdSentinal
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-CalifShe may be a democrat, and a liberal one, but she is not a moonbat.
10
posted on
01/15/2006 10:18:29 AM PST
by
Paradox
(What "tax cuts for the rich". They are paying more taxes now than ever!)
To: LdSentinal
Has DU started a hate thread about her yet?
To: bigsigh
The hearing and the rest is just so much political BS.They are trying to confirm the idea to their voters that they are worthy of reelection.
12
posted on
01/15/2006 10:19:47 AM PST
by
EGPWS
To: Dog Gone
They just want to have another meeting so they can blow gas out of both ends of they overfed bodies.
13
posted on
01/15/2006 10:20:21 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: Pukin Dog
There's nothing stopping the President from mentioning him, anyway. Put it in the context of demanding swifter action on judicial nominees.
14
posted on
01/15/2006 10:20:53 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Parmy
Word is DU'ers are threatening to go green if they do not filibuster.
15
posted on
01/15/2006 10:21:26 AM PST
by
mware
(The keeper of the I's once again.)
To: Paradox
She may be a democrat, and a liberal one, but she is not a moonbat.
Me thinks you are too kind!
16
posted on
01/15/2006 10:21:34 AM PST
by
plsvn
To: alisasny
In all likelyhood Pres. Bush will get one more pick to SC.... if they filibuster over Alito that makes them look even more silly for the 3rd pick.
And, please Lord, the 4th.
If they try to use the filibuster they will have their collective @$$s handed to them. The filibuster will then be off the table for the real fight, the replacement of Justice Bader-Ginsburg (within 18 months) and possibly Justice Stevens.
17
posted on
01/15/2006 10:21:56 AM PST
by
Talking_Mouse
(Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
To: Paradox
Nah, she's a moonbat alright. She's just having an off day.
She's is a leading proponent of gun control. She at one time, perhaps still does carry a concealed weapon herself.
18
posted on
01/15/2006 10:22:08 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
To: LdSentinal
"While we harbor some anxiety about the direction he may push the court, we would be more alarmed at the long-term implications of denying him a seat."
Dianne actually gets it.
Deny Alito, get Janice Rodgers Brown.
Deny JRB and get someone even tougher.
You democrats want "hard ball" we got yer "Hard ball"!
19
posted on
01/15/2006 10:23:26 AM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Dog Gone
Not good enough. Alito is going to be SEATED in the front row, with his wife next to Laura during the speech. This is what the Dems want to prevent.
20
posted on
01/15/2006 10:23:48 AM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson