Four years ago, thinking a few muslims could get onto planes, hijack them, and destroy the Twin Towers while killing 3,000 innocent people was folly too.
Guess our versions of "folly" can change with time.
I said in my post:>>>Thinking Israel would approach an attack on Iran conventionally is, in my opinion, folly<<<
You quoted me as saying: >>>Thinking Israel would approach an attack on Iran, in my opinion, folly!<<<
You left out the words: conventionally is.....changes the whole meaning doesn't it.
Now do we agree.....or not?
The key word was 'conventionally.' Otherwise, the quote has no meaning.