Posted on 01/11/2006 12:13:44 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
That is untrue. You will have to talk to the recently releasd soldiers who were attached to this lash-up.
I have. There will always be a few who demand nothing but perfection in everything but themselves. I did meet one disgruntled soldier who complained that a friend had been killed when Stryker was hit with an IED. The Sargent I was talking to at the time added that the "IED" was five 500 pound bombs wired together.
Vetvoice - Some points:
I have no idea why you are directing this comment to me. And my "gullibility days are long passed.
I do have contact with both active duty military, contractors and OEM personnel on a somewhat daily basis. What this has always told me is that everybody has their own "truths" in what they say. I don't have a damn thing to do with Strykers, so I simply don't friggin' know from beans about them other than what I hear and read. Which gives me exactly squat worth of opinion.
IMO, Cannoneer No.4 has always performed an exemplary job of providing accurate and multi-sided info. He has also made it clear when he is/was presenting a personal opinion on issues. If you have a problem/bitch/complaint or difference of opinion with something he posts, be prepared to back it up with valid sources and references - not scuttle butt or barracks BS. We all know what that is worth. And if so, discuss it with him via back-channels.
I have found that there are a lot of "experts" on here and a few who have the real skinny. And they ain't necessarily the same folks all the time.
Thank you for sharing that with me. I will give it due consideration.
Hope you get to feeling better.
Cannoneer No. 4
Most of the guys who I went to war with, those who stayed in, wanted to stay Stryker. Even the guys who grew up on Bradleys and Tanks.
Sorry, but I don't recall the exchange.
There are not many whose "truths" have been fact-checked and published by daily newspaers. I've published seven articles.
War profiteer huh?
Not exactly news, and not limited to General Dynamics. Civilian tech reps have long been used to maintain equipment, even way back before I retired over 20 years ago. They were even used at the depot level during the Viet Nam War.
My only objection to the Stryker was always the corruption used by Generals Heebner, Keane and Shinseki to pull off the deal. They will not even allow us to breathe now that our military is shot through and through with wheeled armor. They need to, at least, 'fess up to the Americans how many tracked vehicles the Soviets lost is Afghanistan (1250) before they withdrew them and brought in all tracks.
Civilian tech reps are the only ones allowed to work on the Stryker - even at the organization level?
Name one system during Vietnam that required civilian technicians.
I back mine with three years in the Army, 18 months in Vietnam and eight years in college - four for a Bachelors, two for a Masters amd two more for my PhD. That and a lifetime of contacts with all military from servicing soldiers to reserves and contractors keep me pretty well on top of things...
At the depot level it was common for helicopters (onboard the Corpus Christi Bay) - and even for boats. We seldom had the available time to use depot level, we did everything from engine rebuilds to hull repair ourselves until we started working with the Navy. They may have had civilians, but when my boat was in dry dock I was in the hospital.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.