Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supposedly Dead Operating Systems : Digital's VMS Just Keeps Going and Going and Going...
Mass High Tech ( Journal of New England Technology) ^ | Keith Parent and Beth Bumbarger

Posted on 01/10/2006 10:17:04 AM PST by SirLinksalot

Digital’s venerable VMS just keeps going and going and going....

01/09/2006

By Keith Parent and Beth Bumbarger

MASS HIGH TECH : JOURNAL OF NEW ENGLAND TECHNOLOGY

New Englanders old enough to have worked in the region’s computer industry in the halcyon days of the mid-to-late 1980s participated in one of the great entrepreneurial periods of our nation’s history. Those were the days of the Massachusetts Miracle, when technology titans such as Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC), Wang Laboratories, Data General and Prime Computer Inc. employed tens of thousands of high-tech professionals in what then Gov. Michael Dukakis described in a famous understatement as “good jobs at good wages.”

The “Big Four” as they were known, disappeared in the late 1990s. In the space of two years, Wang went bankrupt and was acquired by Getronics. Prime became Computervision Corp., which later was bought by Parametric Technology Corp. Data General was sold to EMC Corp., and Digital disappeared into Compaq Computer Corp., which shortly thereafter merged into Hewlett-Packard Co.

Thousands of minicomputer alumni in the region still work here, and we share some bittersweet memories of those years when New England ruled the roost. It is hard for today’s New England high-tech workers to comprehend the scale of those companies. Yet a funny thing happened on their way to extinction. Their products lived on. The hardware and software they developed in the 1970s and 1980s is still being used by customers worldwide.

Take Digital’s Virtual Memory System (VMS) operating system. VMS was released in 1977 to support the VAX 11/780, the first commercially available 32-bit computer in the world. The VAX/VMS system was wildly popular, and by 1982 Digital was second only to IBM Corp. in computer sales.

In 1992, Digital introduced the Alpha 64-bit computer and renamed its operating system Open/VMS. Its clustering capability — which allows users to link many VAXes into a virtual mainframe — is still considered state-of-the-art. Stories abound about the systems reliability; the most famous, perhaps, being how the Irish National Railroad ran its system for 17 years without a single reboot. Try to accomplish that on today’s systems.

VAX, Alpha and Open/VMS are particularly prized in the financial, health care and telecommunications industries, where high availability is critical. No wonder more than 400,000 VAX and Alpha systems are used by 10 million people daily. All good things come to an end. While Open/VMS will probably survive for decades, the VAX and Alpha architectures will gradually be phased out by Hewlett-Packard, which wants customers to migrate to its newer Integrity servers. As HP removes its support for these products, the ecosystem of Digital spin-offs, most with fewer than 100 employees, will step to the fore and keep these venerable systems running. Whether it’s memory boards, storage controllers, or the most sophisticated software consulting services, New England really is the digital center of excellence.

New technology life cycles tend to be measured in months, not years. That may be true of consumer goods such as cell phones. But there are so many examples of robust, mission-critical systems in use today that are still supporting the financial, transportation, health care, telecommunications and energy infrastructure. We would not be the least bit surprised if Digital’s systems outlive the people who created them.

Keith Parent is CEO of Court Square Data Group, an IT consulting firm in Springfield. Beth Bumbarger is CEO of Nemonix Engineering of Northborough, which provides VAX and AlphaServer upgrades, service and support.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: computers; dec; digital; hightech; vax; vms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
Of interest only for you techies out there ...

I don't use VMS anymore ( I do UNIX and LINUX nowadays ). But I cannot help but feel nostalgic for this venerable Operating System which is reliable, easy to use and program, highly scalable, and virtually unhackable ( and which apparently, is not dead yet ).

1 posted on 01/10/2006 10:17:08 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I agree. I coded under VMS for six years, and I loved all the system services and library routines. Very powerful.


2 posted on 01/10/2006 10:19:09 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

I wrote assembly for a VAX, it was like writing C.


3 posted on 01/10/2006 10:20:42 AM PST by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
the VAX and Alpha architectures will gradually be phased out by Hewlett-Packard, which wants customers to migrate to its newer Integrity servers.

They forgot to include 'planned obsolesence' in their feature list.

There is plenty of 'old' tech that gets phased out because someone wants to sell you the 'new' thing. But some of the old stuff is still the best.

4 posted on 01/10/2006 10:22:41 AM PST by atomicpossum (If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

VMS! now that brings back fond memories. they even had a help feature that was actually understandable.
who can forget sysgen, autogen, authorize, ncp, etc.?


5 posted on 01/10/2006 10:23:44 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

"ran its system for 17 years without a single reboot. Try to accomplish that on today’s systems.

I dunno about that. We ran a Solaris machine for five or six years without rebooting. Then the hardware wore out.


6 posted on 01/10/2006 10:24:04 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti
I coded in C under VMS, mostly real-time financial systems (trading, gov't bonds, et cetera). Loved SMG and, particularly, the VMS DLM which had the blocking-AST feature. Makes UNIX's signals/semaphores seem useless by comparison. AST's in general were incredibly useful.
7 posted on 01/10/2006 10:24:39 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

My college (James Madison University) had a VAXcluster when I was a student there 1984-87. Started off with an 11/785, 11/780, and 11/750; by the time I graduated they'd moved up to an 8650, 8600, and the 11/785. As a student operator and Computer Information Systems major, I LOVED those things. Super-easy to work with, far easier than IBM's stuff. Manning the help desk was never easy, but it was a lot easier trying to get the psych majors who were taking a computer stats class up and running on VAX/VMS instead of on, say, MVS.

Later on I worked briefly with a company that was trying to hook an early Windows PC network (circa 1992) running Gupta SQLWindows up with a MicroVAX II as a file server. The Wintel network wasn't capable of doing what they wanted it to do, but that little VAX was absolutely bulletproof.

I've got a soft spot in my heart for those things. :)

}:-)4


8 posted on 01/10/2006 10:24:48 AM PST by Moose4 ("I will shoulder my musket and brandish my sword/In defense of this land and the word of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti

"I wrote assembly for a VAX, it was like writing C."

You say that like its a bad thing...


9 posted on 01/10/2006 10:25:10 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
it just sat there and ran . . . forever. you could pile users on it until it creaked. and new releases had meaningful new features, WITHOUT the continuous stream of emergency patches, fixes, and security PAKs.
10 posted on 01/10/2006 10:25:23 AM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
My company has made VMS operating systems it's current standard for process control. Very robust, muti-user friendly, and no concerns about operating system updates and viruses. I love it.
It's not as pretty as Windows graphical display, but were trying to make money here, not play with high maintenace toys.
11 posted on 01/10/2006 10:26:55 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

A lot of the reason VMS is still around is that there isn't really that easy of a migration path away from it.

When Windows came out, you could still (and can still) run most DOS programs on it.


12 posted on 01/10/2006 10:26:56 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Same story here. What a great old warhorse! I still think VMS clustering is the best of class and it's been around for a very, very long time now.


13 posted on 01/10/2006 10:26:56 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

i configured the first state-owned mixed architecture VMS cluster (VAX/Alpha). a lot of unsupported stuff could be made workable under VMS. it was fun in those days!

anybody remember pathworks?


14 posted on 01/10/2006 10:27:05 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

Could you sit on the hill when you were at JMU?

If you don't know what I am talking about, the answer is "no".


15 posted on 01/10/2006 10:27:11 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
When I was contracting in the IT dept at GE, there was one guy there who used to support the VAX servers. That was in 1997.

Our group were all Novell, NT, MAC and HPUNIX geeks, we would always tell him to learn NT or UNIX because he won't have a job in five years if he didn't. The VAX systems are still there and so is he.

We used to sing a parity of the Beatles "Tax Man" whenever he was around.
16 posted on 01/10/2006 10:27:48 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Learn from the past, don't live in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Data General

I was a Data General (and look alike) geek using IRIS O/S. One of the first true multi user systems. File and screen handling was a little obtuse but you could develop a lot of programs in a hurry.

17 posted on 01/10/2006 10:29:37 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; All

VMS Rocks!
The DOD has a huge investment in VMS, I can't elaborate on that but some very crucial functions in DOD depend on VMS exclusively


18 posted on 01/10/2006 10:30:05 AM PST by vrwc0915 ("Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

We still use it, running OpenVMS Alpha 7.3-2 on an AlphaServer ES40 with 2 EV67 500Mhz CPUs, 5 Gb of memory. Bulletproof. The system is used to run an Oracle data server.

The lack of support for end-user reporting tools on VMS may cause us to move to Linux at some point (~3-5 years), but the systems (hardwaree and software) are well built and run well.


19 posted on 01/10/2006 10:30:09 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
... the VAX 11/780, the first commercially available 32-bit computer in the world.

This doesn't sound right.

As I recall, IBM was building 32-bit machines for decades before the VAXen.

Perhaps the article meant "...first commercially available 32-bit minicomputer..."

20 posted on 01/10/2006 10:30:09 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson