And Thomas and Scalia joined in a common dissent in Rasul v. Bush, 542 US 466 (2004).
Even though there are only a handful of cases (Hamdi, Hamdan, Rasul, Padilla), I still haven't wrapped my brain around the specific issues each case addressed, and which issues are left rather unsettled. I take Rasul as a narrow finding of habeas corpus jurisdiction (under 28 USC 2241) of US Article III Courts over 1) alien prisoners, 2) held at Gitmo. Scalia & Thomas (& Rhenquist) dissenting said "no, and it's up to Congress to adjust 2241." It is the Rasul case that provoked Lindsey Graham's introduction of S.AMND.2516 - modified to S.AMND.2524, on November 14, 2005.
A good number of FReepers howled in derision at Graham's audacity! LOL.
Thanks for the info. It's a lot. I hope to get a chance to look over all of it, sometime.