Gee, then I wonder what Kohl thinks of Kelo?
I've been out for a while. Has anyone mentioned the Kelo case?
Vanguard was asking, "Do we put the money in customer A's account? or customer B's account?" Vanguard stood to gain or lose nothing as a result of the decision. Vanguard was not a defendant in the sense that people would think of "a defendant."
I wonder if Wulf Blitzo can understand that?