Posted on 01/08/2006 2:24:03 PM PST by Lorianne
I guess raising and educating the future generation is not a very valuable pursuit. Unfortunately, economics suggest you are wrong. The housewife is an impact on not only her children's future productivity, but her husbands earnings. Our society will only impoverish itself if it discourages future productivity.
The sad thing is she is now taking the side of the group that put her in this position. Any rational law would recognize the situation and ensure the husband supported her for the rest of her life.
I doubt it- I know many companies thaty force people to retire at 65. It's different for everyone.
Not true. I've seen plenty of cases were the wife gets next to nothing because of no-fault laws.
I think we'd all be surprised how often personal tragedy (like in this example) or personal failure fuels a total political worldview.
And if, if fact, the court doesn't provide for ample alimony, then she's right in that young women would be wise to keep up with their careers, and not chuck it all to raise the kids.
How many companies will hire a 67 year old (other than Walmart)?
How many people can just pick themselves up and start a successful business at 67 years old?
She did once write a book and get it published. So she can't be completely like "you want fries with that"
I'd like to know how many of the FReepers who like to say "get a job, you lazy idiot!" on these threads would actually offer to help out another unemployed, fiftysomething FReeper?
That poor lady. If more of us acted like men should there would be no feminism.
Lawyers usually won't let the party cite divorce anymore.
Lawyers usually won't let the party cite adultery anymore.
The first step is a massive change in presumptions in that gender roles are not interchangable.
She shouldn't have to get a job. After being married for 40 years she should get at least half of her husband's assets and conitued earnings, since he ended the marriage.
Interesting. No feminist here but raising my three daughters toward professional careers. I want marriage, kids, the works for them but never want them to be dependent upon their husbands for existence.
I've always been of the position that it's perfectly fine to know how to be a good wife and homemaker as long as a woman also has the skills, talents, knowledge and resources to provide for herself and her family if something horrible or unexpected happens to her husband or if her husband does something horrible to her.
Excellent post.
I agree ... only they are not HIS assets, they are THEIR assets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.