Replies

" B. E. has forgotten more about Conservatism than you are likely to ever grasp."

It seems to have forgotten how to make a rational argument, too. That must have been one of those conservative things It forgot. I have 3 quotes by Rand on my homepage, 2 by Darwin, one each by Lock and Jefferson. The political quotes are about property rights and religious freedom. I am not an Objectivist, yet dark fawn thinks It can pretend I am to change the subject. When has obfuscation been a conservative virtue?

I correctly pointed out that Rush Limbaugh recommends Rand's book "Atlas Shrugged" on his website. Does that make him an Objectivist too? Is he a conservative heretic? Would it be correct, in a debate with Limbaugh, to start attacking Objectivism, and only that, because on his web page he recommended one Objectivist book? He would correctly say that you were changing the subject and assuming far too much.

With dark fawn, I have repeated this and yet It still continues to press on with Rand. I say, let It debate Rand to Itself. It seems to be enjoying talking to Itself anyway. Trolls are like that.

As with all trolls who reveal themselves, eventually you have to just walk away from the train wreck.