" I did read your posts, and unfortunately the main point I got from them is that you were equating Hitler with Christianity."
Even after I say Hitler's is a perverted form of Christianity? Your reading comprehension isn't very good.
"Hitler may well have been a non-atheist. But he was also insane. Your mistake lies in equating the views of an insane man as being indicative of a theistic point of view."
*Insanity* is a legal definition. I don't know that he was *insane*. I do know he was evil. And I also know of no evidence he wasn't a theist, though a twisted one. I made it very clear that this was not saying that theists or Christians are like Hitler. What part of that do you not comprehend?
The part where you clearly don't understand what you're saying.