To: quidnunc
OK, now post a reference not that isn't typical MSM "some experts say," and "we've heard once of," b.s. Yes, OLD cars may have problems in a few minor areas (fuel lines, etc.) but no "serious" engine damage.
28 posted on
01/07/2006 8:30:06 PM PST by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
69ConvertibleFirebird wrote:
OK, now post a reference not that isn't typical MSM "some experts say," and "we've heard once of," b.s. Yes, OLD cars may have problems in a few minor areas (fuel lines, etc.) but no "serious" engine damage.I don't have to furnish you with anything.
I made a true observation which you are free to accept or reject, and I provided a link.
If you want to risk a blown engine by using E85 that's your business and none of my concern.
30 posted on
01/07/2006 8:34:02 PM PST by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
"Yes, OLD cars may have problems in a few minor areas (fuel lines, etc.) but no "serious" engine damage. "Do you think repeating this false opinion enough will make it true? I guess the $1,000+ I spent to fix damage done to my RV is not serious in your opinion.
55 posted on
01/09/2006 6:33:15 AM PST by
Wurlitzer
(The difference between the left and terrorists is the terrorists don't claim to support the troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson