Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael81Dus

So you are saying that Al Qaeada should be treated better than POWs because they have chosen to fight as enemy-combatants. I guess you missed the point of my post. We don't try people while we are at war with them. No one has ever done that and we are not obligated to do it now. Hopefully you will be able to understand that and you will stop with the silly comments about "judging" the people at Guantanamo -- at least until the war is over.


86 posted on 01/07/2006 7:54:37 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: vbmoneyspender

Where did I say that these non-combatants shall be treated `better´ than regular POW?? Well, many there are kept in prison for 4 years. There must be some evidence that these people are dangerous. Otherwise, they wouldn´t be there, right? So why don´t you judge them? Or is the evidence not sufficient. The west doesn´t know how to deal with these terrorists properly. Your way isn´t right, that´s what we feel, because it could lead to unjust results, and our way (treating them like normal criminals) isn´t right either, because we often lack evidence and must release them. There must be a right way, or not?!?


89 posted on 01/07/2006 8:02:00 AM PST by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson