Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froufrou

It was about states' rights more than about slavery. It worked out for the North, the states have fewer and fewer rights. It was never set up that way in the first place.


106 posted on 01/06/2006 1:04:25 PM PST by Jaded (The truth shall set you free, but lying to yourself turns you French.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Jaded
It was about states' rights more than about slavery.

States rights to do what? The major states rights issue was the issue of slavery - it wasn't parking tickets.

112 posted on 01/06/2006 1:07:02 PM PST by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Jaded

Yeah, I'd say that's about right. That and the Morrill Tariff.


116 posted on 01/06/2006 1:09:28 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Jaded
It was about states' rights more than about slavery.

It was about states' rights to perpetuate the system of slavery. Had the confederates taken a stand for the defense of states' rights on some other issue besides slavery, they may have had a defensible point. That they wished to exercise their "rights" to keep a class of people in bondage was a violation of the laws of nature, and of the intent of the founding charter of the nation.

More accurately, the war was about a group of states that didn't like the outcome of a constitutionally valid election, and they wanted to take their ball and go home. Petty, childish, and in the end, tragic.

140 posted on 01/06/2006 1:23:08 PM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson