Posted on 01/06/2006 5:43:18 AM PST by Tolik
VDH: We want to see Europe survive. (Really.)
Despite the bitter recrimination and growing rift between you and us, most Americans have not forgotten that a strong, confident Europe is still critical to the material and spiritual well being of the United States.
It is not just that as Westerners you have withstood often later at our side all prior challenges to the shared liberal civilization you created, whether the specter of an Ottoman global suzerainty, Bonapartism, Prussian militarism, Nazism, fascism, Japanese militarism, or Soviet Communism.
Nor is our allegiance a mere matter of history. Europe is the repository of the Western tradition, most manifestly in shrines like the Acropolis, the Pantheon, the Uffizi, or the Vatican. We concede that the Great Books we as yet have not produced a Homer, Virgil, Dante, Shakespeare, or Locke, much less a Da Vinci, Mozart, or Newton and the Great Ideas of the West from democracy to capitalism to human rights originated on your continent alone. And if Americans believe our Constitution and the visions of our Founding Fathers were historic improvements on Europe of the 18th-century, then at least we acknowledge in our humility that they were also inconceivable without it.
No, there is a greater oneness between us, an unspoken familiarity even now in the age of global sameness, that makes an American feel at home in Amsterdam, Paris, Rome, or Athens in a way that is not true of Istanbul, Cairo, or Bangkok.
In the multiracial society of the United States, an American black, Asian, or Latino finds natural affinity in London and Brussels in a way not true in Lagos, Ho Chi Min City, or Lima. For millions of Americans "Eurocentric" is no slur for it is an appellation of shared values and ideas not of race.
Even in this debased era of multiculturalism that misleads our youth into thinking no culture can be worse than the West, we all know in our hearts the truth that we live by and the lie that we profess that the critic of the West would rather have his heart repaired in Berlin than in Guatemala or be a Muslim in Paris rather than a Christian in Riyadh, or a woman or homosexual in Amsterdam than in Iran, or run a newspaper in Stockholm rather than in Havana, or drink the water in Luxembourg rather than in Uganda, or object to his government in Italy rather than in China or North Korea. Radical Muslims damn Europe and praise Allah but whenever possible from Europe rather than inside Libya, Syria, or Iran.
Although we Americans think the European Union is a flawed notion and will not survive to fulfill its present aspirations, we hope in some strange way that it does for both our sakes of having a proud partner in a more dangerous world to come rather than an angry and envious inferior, nursing past glories while blaming others for self-inflicted wounds of the present.
Even in this era of crisis, we cling to the notion that in the eleventh hour you, Europe, will yet reawake, rediscover your heritage, and join with us in defending the idea of the West from this latest illiberal scourge of Islamic fascism. For just once, if only for the purpose of theatrics, we would like to urge calm and restraint to a Europe angry, volatile, and threatening, in the face of blackmail and taunts from a third-rate theocracy in Tehran or a two-bit fascist thug fomenting hate and violence from a state-subsidized mosque in a European suburb.
Alas, recently, Europeans have been taken hostage on the West Bank, Yemen, and Iraq. All have been released. There are two constants in the stories: Some sort of blackmail was no doubt involved (either cash payments or the release of terrorist killers in European jails?), and the captives often seem to praise the moderation of their captors. Is this an aberration or indicative of a deeper continental malady? Few, in either a private or public fashion, suggested that such bribery only perpetuates the kidnapping of innocents and provides cash infusions to terrorists to further their mayhem.
On the home front, a single, though bloody, attack in Madrid changed an entire Spanish election, and prompted the withdrawal of troops from Iraq although the terrorists nevertheless continued, despite their promises to the contrary, to plant bombs and plan assassinations of Spanish judicial officials. Cry the beloved continent.
The entire legal system of the Netherlands is under review due to the gruesome murder of Theo van Gogh and politicians there who speak out about the fascistic tendencies of radical Islam often either face threats or go into hiding. Cry the beloved continent.
Unemployment, postcolonial prejudice, and de facto apartheid may have led to the fiery rioting in the French suburbs, but it was also energized by a radical Islamic culture of hate. In response followed de facto French martial law. All that remains certain is that the rioting will return either to grow or to warp liberal French society. Indeed, so far has global culture devolved in caving to Islamism that we fear that only two places in the world are now safe for a Jew to live in safety and Europe, the graveyard of 20th-century Jewry, is tragically not among them. Cry the beloved continent.
Your idealistic approach to health care, transportation, global warming, and entitlements have won over much of coastal and blue America, who, if given their way, would replicate here what you have there. Yet the worry grows that none of this vision of your anointed is sustainable given an aging and shrinking population, growing and unassimilated minority populations, flat growth rates, increasing statism, and high unemployment.
If America, the former British commonwealth, India, and China, embraced globalization, while the Arab Middle East rejected it, you sought a third way of insulating yourselves from it and now are beginning to pay for trying to legislate and control what is well beyond your ability to do either.
Abroad you face even worse challenges. In the post-Cold War you dismantled your armed forces, and chose to enhance entitlements at the expense of military readiness. I fear you counted only on a tried and simple principle: That the United States would continue to subsidize European defense while ignoring your growing secular religion of anti-Americanism.
But in the last 15 years, and especially after 9/11, heaven did not come to earth, that instead became a more dangerous place than ever before. Worse, in the meantime you lost the goodwill of the United States, which you demonized, I think, on the understanding that there would never be real repercussions to your flamboyant venom.
Your courts indict American soldiers, often a few miles from the very military garrisons that alone protect you. Your media and public castigate the country whose fashion, music, entertainment, and popular culture you so slavishly embrace.
The Balkan massacres proved that a mass murderer like Slobodan Milosevic could operate with impunity in Europe until removed by the intervention of the United States. And yet from that gruesome lesson, in retrospect we over here have learned only two things: The Holocaust would have gone on unabated hours from Paris and Berlin without the leadership of United States, and in this era of the Chirac/Schroeder ingratitude the American public would never sanction such help to you again. If you believe that an American-led NATO should not serve larger Western interests outside of Europe, we concede that it cannot even do that inside it.
We wish you well in your faith that war has become obsolete and that outlaw nations will comply with international jurisprudence that was born and is nurtured in Europe. Yet your own intelligence suggests that the Iran theocracy is both acquiring nuclear weaponry and seeking to craft missile technology to put an Islamic bomb within reach of European cities oblivious to the reasoned appeals of European Union diplomats, who themselves operate as Greek philosophers in the agora only on the condition that Americans will once more play the role of Roman legionaries in the shadows.
Russia may no longer be the mass-murdering Soviet Union, but it remains a proud nationalist and increasingly autocratic power of the 19th-century stripe, nuclear and angry at the loss of its empire, emboldened by the ease that it can starve energy supplies to Western Europe, and tired of humanitarian lectures from Westerners who have no real military to match their condescending sermons. Old Europe has neither the will nor the power to protect the ascending democracies of Eastern Europe, much less the republics of the former Soviet Union from present Russian bullying and perhaps worse to come.
The European strategy of selling weapons to Arab autocracies, triangulating against the United States for oil and influence, and providing cash to dubious terrorists like Hamas has backfired. Polls in the West Bank suggest Palestinians hate you, the generous and accommodating, as much as they do us, the staunch ally of Israel.
So, terrorists of the Middle East seem to have even less respect for you than for the United States, given they harbor a certain contempt for your weakness as relish to the generic hatred of our shared Western traditions.
You will, of course, answer that in your postwar wisdom you have transcended the internecine killing of the earlier 20th century when nationalism and militarism ruined your continent and that you have lent your insight to the world at large that should follow your therapeutic creed rather than the tragic vision of the United States.
But the choices are not so starkly bipolar between either chauvinistic saber rattling or studied pacifism. There is a third way, the promise of muscular democratic government that does not apologize for 2,500 years of civilization and is willing to defend it from the enemies of liberalism, who would undo all that we wrought.
A European Union that facilitates trade, finance, and commerce can enrich and ennoble your continent, but it need not suppress the unique language, character, and customs of European nationhood itself, much less abdicate a heritage that once not merely moralized about, but took action to end, evil.
The world is becoming a more dangerous place, despite your new protocols of childlessness, pacifism, socialism, and hedonism. Islamic radicalism, an ascendant Communist China, a growing new collectivism in Latin America, perhaps a neo-czarist Russia as well, in addition to the famine and savagery in Africa, all that and more threaten the promise of the West.
So criticize us for our sins; lend us your advice; impart to America the wealth of your greater experience but as a partner and an equal in a war, not as an inferior or envious neutral on the sidelines. History is unforgiving. None of us receives exemption simply by reason of the fumes of past glory.
Either your economy will reform, your populace multiply, and your citizenry defend itself, or not. And if not, then Europe as we have known it will pass away to the great joy of the Islamists but to the terrible sorrow of America.
Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. He is the author, most recently, of A War Like No Other. How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War
I recommend that you print it out and anonymously put it in all the mail boxes around you.
bttt
Good observation.
Europe has chosen French cowardice.
That is price countries pay when they no longer have a moral basis to fall back on.
Right now if Iran declares war on your Germany they like the French would have to surrender immediately.
Most Middle Eastern Islamic countries have bigger and stronger armies than any country I can think of in Europe.
If it wasn't for pissing off the US, the Arabs would be marching down main street Europe.
The Jewish extermination by Hitler would seem like a picnic compared to what these Arabs would do to the general population.
How many ways can you say extermination to all non Muslims.
Pull your head out and think about what it is your supporting.
I think you missed VDH's point. He's saying that radical Islam poses an urgent threat to Europa, and that the current intellectual climate is such that it is impossible to consider the nature and extent of that challenge in polite company. He's not slamming Europe, just pointing out that you might want to consider manning the watch.
Your situation in Germany is different than France and the low countries, but is troubling nonetheless. Hop on the train to Rotterdam and take a trolly down to the stadium, and you'll get the idea of what VDH is talking about more directly.
There was one other article by Mark Steyn posted a couple of days ago on this topic that was more blunt. (link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550710/posts )
Here's the salient point from Steyn : "The challenge for those who reckon western civilization is on balance better than the alternatives is to figure out a way to save at least some parts of the west."
For what it's worth, I think that Steyn's more pessimistic view is correct. Sure hope I'm wrong, though.
I think this time around we should start "taxing" countries for liberating them or providing security for their lame governments.
That was the sad and false dream of the entire post-WWII world, not just Europe. The idea, as I remember it, was that WWII was so horrible that war in general was an unthinkable alternative in international relations.
People forget, but more to the point, young people do not believe, and to a new generation that did not experience the horrors of the camps and the trenches war seems, as it has always seemed, a viable alternative. I have yet to find in history a time when people so convinced have been talked out of the notion. And it doesn't take very many of them, either, in an age where technology offers a huge destructive force to relatively few.
There is an underlying pacifist assumption that only conquerors and would-be conquerors possess swords, and that universal disarmament will result in a rejection of force as a policy tool. That is a lesson people must un-learn as often as the "war is a first resort" lesson.
Beat the plowshares back into swords. The other was a maiden aunt's dream. - Robert Heinlein.
too good to not megaping
Mark Stein addressed the dying Euro nations yesterday with his insight. Between the two articles, we can see the coming demise of Europe as it has been and their impact on Blue America, aka, our disloyal Rat party.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550710/posts
It's the demography, stupid ..... Mark Steyn
The New Criterion ^ | 2 Jan 2006 | Mark Steyn
Posted on 01/02/2006 12:04:17 PM PST by Rummyfan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550710/posts
Demography is destiny.
In 50 years, the muezzin will call Allahuh Akbar from the minarets of the mosque which was once Notre Dame.
Thanks for the ping!
Given the degree to which France is nulear, methinks we have an interest in precluding that event.
This I have to wonder about, though:
In the multiracial society of the United States, an American black, Asian, or Latino finds natural affinity in London and Brussels in a way not true in Lagos, Ho Chi Minh City, or Lima. For millions of Americans "Eurocentric" is no slur for it is an appellation of shared values and ideas not of race.
It was certainly true twenty or fifty years ago that Americans felt closer to Europe than to those other parts of the world. Europe was "home" even to those who weren't of predominantly European ancestry -- though of course, our relationship to Europe, whatever our race or ancestry, has been a complicated and conflicted one.
Is it still true now that Americans, White or Black or Asian or Latino feel closer to Europe than to Asia or Latin America or Australia or Africa? As different as other parts of the world may be, widespread American popular culture has a way of smoothing the way for us, at least in the cities.
Our schooling doesn't make us feel closer to Europe as it once did. If things continue in the same way for 20 more years, we'll feel as much in or out of place in Lima or Tokyo or Lagos as in Paris or Rome or Copenhagen. Of course, as other countries develop their own popular culture and make their own particular adaptations to modernity, this may all change, and make the outside world more alien.
And it doesn't take very many of them, either, in an age where technology offers a huge destructive force to relatively few.
There is an underlying pacifist assumption that only conquerors and would-be conquerors possess swords, and that universal disarmament will result in a rejection of force as a policy tool. That is a lesson people must un-learn as often as the "war is a first resort" lesson.
This is exactly what scares me the most. We in the West (and I think we can include large parts of Asia too) perfectly understand the benefits of peace.
But there were, there are now and probably always will be ruthless people who get instant advantage acting uncivilized way inside of the pacifist crowd. When such ruthless people are not just opportunist who can be bought off (at least in theory) but adherents of an irreconcilable religious fanaticism; and when technological advances allow small numbers of people to create chaos in the society that only huge armies of the past were capable of doing; all this in the open and accessible world -- it is scary. Especially so that large part of the population (half here and most abroad) deny that such threat exists at all.
The only solution is (like VDH and others noted) is for adults to quietly do their business and try to educate "teenagers" if it all possible.
Are you talking about the cold war with the former Soviet Union?
Please let me know how Germany won the cold war.
Some folks around here were thinking that Ronald Reagan had a hand in that.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Brilliant! Sign me up. Thanks
"Hanson and Steyn double ping "
Speaking of Steyn, I am surprised I haven't seen this Mark Steyn piece (It's the Demography, Stupid!) posted on FR.
It is the perfect complement to this Hanson article and should also be saved on everyone's hard drive.
It is a bit long, but you will be richly rewarded by reading it:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007760
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.