Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Williams
When I look at the Middle East, I don't see a powerful fundamentalist state after the conquest of Iran. It needs to be done, most likely with a full scale invasion. Make the dominoes fall on the other side.

Realistically, yes we will need to take on Iran. But we have neither the political will or the supplies in place for an invasion. And if Iran really has nukes (which is sounds like they do), putting a battle group in the region would give him a big target.

This guy truly believes that the Shiite messiah is coming soon. That is what old Osoma also said. There is no way to rationally guess what will happen now.

42 posted on 01/05/2006 11:06:01 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum
Iran doesn't yet have a live nuke but the response to Iran using one is obvious. If we don't have the political will we damn well better get it because this is what needs to be done. I don't know about you, but I do not want my family incinerated because Nancy Pelosi would have criticized the President for protecting us. We have a lot of forces in that region and send in what ever else we need.

Anybody doubt that an attack on Iran would gain 75% support of the American people in the early going?

48 posted on 01/05/2006 11:15:36 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum
"This guy truly believes that the Shiite messiah is coming soon. That is what old Osoma also said. There is no way to rationally guess what will happen now."

Yeah, the Anti-Christ.

53 posted on 01/05/2006 11:20:14 AM PST by standingfirm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson