Good for your math. Tell that to every major newspaper and sportswriter that referred to USC as back to back national champs.
"Good for your math. Tell that to every major newspaper and sportswriter that referred to USC as back to back national champs."
Every newspaper and sportwriter that referred to USC as back to back national champs was dead wrong. Just like when they predicted USC would win last night. Now their collective sexual fondling of SC makes them look like the whores they are, and USC like the LOSERS they are. HAHAHAHAHAHA WE WON WE WON WE WON WE WON.
You rely on the media to get their facts straight? Next time some one says that George Bush isn't an idiot, I'll just say that it has to be true since most of the media thinks he is.
In previous BCS games, the topped ranked team has is only about 2-7 I think. This shows that the media have no idea who the best team is.
How hard is it to understand that USC signed on to the BCS system where the national champion is to be determined by the BCS championship game?
The 2003 national champion was LSU. The Bowl Championship Series is a lousy system, but it's the system USC signed up for. You can't agree to play for a championship under one set of rules, then, when you don't win the championship, say, "Well, we won the championship under these other rules."
Unless you think the accountants at Enron were straight shooters.
Oh my gosh, you forgot David Letterman and John Kerry on your list of references. Haven't you learned that Rats lie and rewrite history to reflect their politically correct wishes. The fact is the recent BCS champions are LSU, USC and UT. There was no chance of a three peat, because there was no two peat. Surely you didn't swallow that "best team ever" and that "best coach ever" garbage spewed by the rat media.