Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
[ Science is NOT (1)agnostic not (2)theistic or (3)atheistic. (implyied)]

Science is 1,2,3 as much as the scientist is..
Science is composed of scientists.. basically semantically adept technology laywers.. Sophomores on crack, usually.. If "spinning" of news is possible, and it is, "spinning" of facts is too.., and are..

Example: Academe has not discovered that socialism is slavery by giverment.. or they have but have "spun" the facts to match their particular worldviews.. I'm Not talking about some parts of the academy but ALL parts of it, even mathematics.. You have you're rare scientist, thats open, but thats not the rule.. Drugs are controlled by the FDA whom is/are in bed with the Pharm industry..

When people believe nothing then they will fall for anything.. like, scientists are NOT SINNERS... propagandizing for their own beneifit.. Science is or has become about MONEY.. "Pure" science requires a "pure" scientist.. ALL or most validity checks have been bought off..

887 posted on 01/05/2006 6:55:14 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies ]


To: hosepipe

The statements of science are not atheistic or theistic. They are agnostic concerning the existence of a God. Statements by scientists that are theistic or atheistic are NOT scientific statements. God is not examinable by science. It's a theological/philosophical statement, not a scientific one.


908 posted on 01/06/2006 5:24:37 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson