To: js1138
Conservatives want the local community to decide what is or isn't useless bunk.(After all the community might conclude that evolution theory is useless bunk.) Not some unelected person in a black robe and not the bureaucrats in the state capital or Washington D.C.
We have our hands full fighting of the likes of Hillary and her nanny state allies. Now 'conservatives" want to join her in her war on the family. It is a crying shame.
48 posted on
01/03/2006 1:02:49 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: BenLurkin
"Conservatives want the local community to decide what is or isn't useless bunk.("
Science does not operate on a democratic basis, though. We don't vote on scientific theories, nor should we. Religion is another matter.
When an entire community is made up of biological scientists, then such an election might make sense. I know of no such community.
55 posted on
01/03/2006 1:07:01 PM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: BenLurkin
Conservatives want the local community to decide what is or isn't useless bunk. So, what is and is not science should be determined by same people who elected Bill Clinton twice and have made Survivor a top-rated show?
61 posted on
01/03/2006 1:10:51 PM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: BenLurkin
Conservatives want the local community to decide what is or isn't useless bunk. It takes a village?
366 posted on
01/04/2006 6:30:23 AM PST by
atlaw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson