Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From the Rehm article:

"Rehm, who was one of 11 plaintiffs in the intelligent design trial ..."

359 posted on 01/04/2006 6:16:22 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

Sounds to me like a close election where one side (the agitated one) got its voters out to the polls and lopsided liberal media coverage did the rest. However, I'm willing to abide by the will of the voters on this issue. Are you? Not just in this election, but in any others that may occur, including those where the other side wins?


361 posted on 01/04/2006 6:24:59 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Well, I guess that completes that. Can Thomas More appeal this thing without the Board's consent? Doesn't make sense to me, but a lot of legal things don't make sense to me. Where's the real test that will go all the way come from? Kansas? Seems unlikely to me. Somewhere out there a "tighter" test case is brewing right now.

After a few more losses, the DI will change course again and we'll start all over again.


391 posted on 01/04/2006 7:20:15 AM PST by furball4paws (The new elixir of life - dehydrated toad urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson