Thomas you should read Rehnquits dissent in Wallace v Jaffree for a primer on estabishment clause jurisprudence and original intent. You're lost in a lost world.
You posted: "Thomas you should read Rehnquits dissent in Wallace v Jaffree for a primer on estabishment clause jurisprudence and original intent. You're lost in a lost world."
Reply: A dissent is just what it is--a minority opinion that lost.
I am familiar with the majority opinons in McCollum, Torcasso, Engel, Schempp, Lemon, Lee, etc. Have you ever read even one of them?
I confess to being a blind man blindfolded in a dark room on a moonless night, but evolution makes sense to me, and ID does not.