Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
[ Truly, they should "care less" as you say. Thanks for your post! ]

Maybe I'm missing something.. I ain't too smart.. But really ID can be no threat to the so-called "pure" scientists.. Its almost like they consider the human or public brain as their private reserve.. any other ideas are almost poaching..

Absolutely the reason education should be locally controlled.. and NOT federally controlled..

173 posted on 01/03/2006 4:37:55 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: All; b_sharp; Ichneumon; longshadow; CarolinaGuitarman; Thatcherite; Coyoteman; js1138; Junior; ...
You may be interested in this. It's tonight. Probably now:

The Collapse of Intelligent Design: Will the next MONKEY TRIAL be in Ohio?*

A talk by Ken Miller, professor of biology, Brown University


Tuesday, January 3, 2006
7 p.m.
Strosacker Auditorium
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Free and open to the public

DETAILS:


Kenneth R. Miller, Ph.D., was the star witness in the recent “Panda Trial” in Dover, Pennsylvania, where Judge John E. Jones found intelligent design to be a religious view, not science. Prof. Miller is the author of a bestselling high school biology textbook that was subject to the Cobb County, Georgia, disclaimer sticker that warned students that evolution was “a theory, not a fact.” The stickers were removed by court order in 2005. Prof. Miller also is author of the bestseller, “Finding Darwin’s God.”

Questions from the audience will be entertained.

Source where this is found: here.

176 posted on 01/03/2006 4:45:17 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: hosepipe
Its almost like they consider the human or public brain as their private reserve.. any other ideas are almost poaching..

Do scientists propose we ban the teaching history, philosophy, theology, politics, government, etc., etc.? Hardly.

I think that scientist are primarily concerned that the tiny sliver of time referred to as "science class" actually be used to teach science.
190 posted on 01/03/2006 5:01:45 PM PST by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: hosepipe
Maybe I'm missing something.. I ain't too smart.. But really ID can be no threat to the so-called "pure" scientists.. Its almost like they consider the human or public brain as their private reserve.. any other ideas are almost poaching..

A good word for it, hosepipe! If science really had the public brain as their private reserve then there would be no need for theology, philosophy, politics, mathematics and all the other disciplines...

Thanks for your post!

291 posted on 01/03/2006 7:55:04 PM PST by Alamo-Girl (Monthly is the best way to donate to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson