It is noteworthy that "intelligent design" has never produced a single graph. Never produced a cause and effect account. Never described a new species. Never contributed an iota to the classification of animals or plants in the taxonomic descriptions. Never introduced a new idea into technology.
In fact, ID has never contributed anything positive. It's all negative--"Evilution" has "flaws"--therefore ID must be right. Such a silly argument. It's really an afront to our god-given ability to look at the evidence and feel comfortable as to where this leads us.
Creationists have given me an enhanced respect for the FSM.
Kind of like Howard Dean's leadership of the Democratic Party -- the Republicans are wrong, therefore we are right (without having to present any actual arguments for our program).