[airedale]

This is silly. You don't like the law, you don't like the way the constitution has been interpreted by courts. You have your own opinion which disagrees with the law, legal scholars and the courts. We're going around in circles. There is no point in continuing this.

[Badray]

You are right. This is silly. You have given up your right to think for yourself and now you just accept someone else's opinion as to the meaning of some pretty plain language. Do you think that since these rulings are some 200 years out from when the document was written -- and it held up as I suggested for the better part of that time -- that there might be an agenda at work?

Do you believe that the SCOTUS is unbiased? Or are you just willing to accept what some biased, anti liberty justices have to say?

Do you like the way the SC interprets the Constitution?

Do you believe that McCain Feingold is constitutional?

Don't give me what the courts have said. What do you think?