To: InvisibleChurch
This can be done thru numerous historical documents. This judge is a typical secularist who 'thinks he is thinking' when he spouts this Atheist nonsense.
Any competent historian will hand this rube his hat in court.
13 posted on
01/02/2006 4:38:19 PM PST by
keithtoo
(Leftists/Democrats - Traitors, Haters and Vacillators)
To: keithtoo
I believe it is actually harder to prove that Aristotle existed, because his existence is only verified by his self-confessed disciple.
To: keithtoo
" This judge is a typical secularist who 'thinks he is thinking' when he spouts this Atheist nonsense."
I'm confused. Which judge is that?
22 posted on
01/02/2006 4:44:59 PM PST by
Bob J
(RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
To: keithtoo
The judge requesting the historical documentation dismissed the allegedly libeled atheist's case. His appellate court ordered him to take the case. Thus, the reason for his request.
124 posted on
01/02/2006 8:51:56 PM PST by
PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
(How long do we have to pretend that the vast majority of Democrats are patriots?)
To: keithtoo
Pard, you must remember that in this age, to many, if not most, secular folks, there is no such thing as "truth".
"They" deny the Jewish Holocaust, "they" insist that "Uncle Joe" and Chairman Mao were misunderstood heroes. These are the people who think Klintoon's impeachment was about sex. These are the democRAT's base.
"These people" are frikkin insane.
"Truth" to "them" is whatever "they" believe it is, a la Orwell.
INSANE.
130 posted on
01/02/2006 11:15:13 PM PST by
porkchops 4 mahound
("Si vis pacem, para bellum", If you wish peace, prepare for war.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson