Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker
It's Rockefeller, Leahy, and that FISA judge who just resigned. Throw in some disgruntled CIA types and maybe a few Clinton holdovers at Foggy Bottom and that'l be a pretty good start at taking out the trash.

I've heard that the NYT said that their sources were "nearly a dozen" current and former government officials. I say we should call them "The Dirty (nearly) Dozen". Does anyone remember back in 2002 when the FBI was questioning Intelligence Committee members, congressional staff members and officials at the CIA and NSA for leaks? Remember they refused to take lie detector tests? If the reporters now say their sources were among this group, can they be in serious trouble for lying to the FBI? Isn't it a felony?

62 posted on 12/31/2005 6:22:17 AM PST by DejaJude (Life, liberty and the pursuit of those that threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DejaJude
nearly a dozen" current and former government officials.

If anyone from the administration was involved they would have said current and former administrative officials.

This is not going to touch anyone from the administration.

66 posted on 12/31/2005 6:24:09 AM PST by mware (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: DejaJude

Sounds like the NYTimes is trying to hide behind numbers....saying 'nearly a dozen' current and former officials were their sources. If so many thought it was a good idea to leak national security secrets then it's okay. (Nobody in his right mind would buy that argument.)


180 posted on 12/31/2005 10:32:15 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson