Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ccwoman
I am just not sure that the girl's sexual orientation is any worse than many of the other "sins" that are occurring in that or any other "private Christian" school.

You're completely missing the point made by others in this thread. Mere sexual orientation doesn't seem to be the issue; how would orientation come to light unless evidenced by BEHAVIOR? In otherwords, how does this suspicion exist unless the girls have been engaging in obvious behavior or are defending the lifestyle as acceptable? And, as others have said, sinning is one thing - justifying and celebrating a sin (something that is consistently done in that movement) is quite another. And Jesus did single out sexual sin as particularly serious, saying is was uniquely a sin against one's own body and that one should flee from it.

25 posted on 12/30/2005 5:06:03 AM PST by fwdude (The worst advice you can give some people is "Be yourself")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude



The lawsuit alleges that the school's principal, Gregory Bork, called the girls into his office and grilled them on their sexual orientation and "coerced" one girl to say she loved the other one. Bork did not immediately return a call left on his work voicemail.

The next day, the suit says, Bork told the girls' parents they could not stay at the school with "those feelings." In a Sept. 12 letter to the parents, Bork acknowledged officials had seen no physical contact between the girls but said their friendship was "uncharacteristic of normal girl relationships and more characteristic of a lesbian one."


29 posted on 12/30/2005 9:41:06 AM PST by ccwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson