Replies

But it is pretty pathetic that you can only come up with scenarios of hostage takers and nuclear bombers to justify surveillance of American citizens who have never done anything wrong. Why can't you come up with a scenario that actually involves reality? I guess it is because you are so shaking-in-your-boots terrified of the Muslim under your bed that you feel like your throat is going to be slit every time you close your eyes.

No. As I stated above I have a reasonable fear of both government control and anarchist(terrorist) control.

But it's pretty pathetic that you you make that up about me and it's pretty pathetic that you would come up with a scenario that we are going after American citizens who haven't done anything wrong.

BTW, you better not use the phone. The Goobermint is listening to you and they want to snuff you out.

Your phone number is on the list -- BOO!

The only scenarios I'm 'coming up with' are the ones that have been reported. I don't know who the NSA is listening to, and neither do you. But if you believe they are only listening to AQ and people communicating with AQ, I've got some real, real nice land you might be interested in...

As I stated above I have a reasonable fear of both government control and anarchist(terrorist) control.

Islamic terrorists are anarchists - their goal is a theocracy. Many theocons here in the states have the same goal, just without the violence and a different religion.

Why did you choose to try to link Islamic terrorism with anarchists?

There are certainly other types of terrorist besides Islamic ones, but to be realistic, we all know which ones we worry about. It's not like the Patriot Act was created to protect SUV dealerships from ELF.