Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zook; lugsoul
And, I think, a moral coward to boot. I'd hate to be a child or spouse of his, for I'd fear he'd call his lawyer before defending my life.

Lugsoul would probably ask a judge for a warrant before he would sneak in the back door of a snoozing hostage taker.

Lugsoul as CIC, if he had credible reports that 12 nukes were about to go off in 12 cities at the residence of 12 terrorists, he would probably waste valuable time getting a warrant.

Right, lugsoul?

193 posted on 12/30/2005 8:54:23 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

Nope. None of that is correct. But it is pretty pathetic that you can only come up with scenarios of hostage takers and nuclear bombers to justify surveillance of American citizens who have never done anything wrong. Why can't you come up with a scenario that actually involves reality? I guess it is because you are so shaking-in-your-boots terrified of the Muslim under your bed that you feel like your throat is going to be slit every time you close your eyes.


202 posted on 12/30/2005 11:09:14 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson