Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zook
The 'interception of messages from foreign enemies' is an easy call.

What say you to 'the interception of a telephone call from a US citizen to a relative in Egypt at a number that was used on three occasions to call a telephone number associated with a known Al Qaeda sympathiser in Egypt, who had not committed any terrorist acts himself but made statements in support of those who did, which number belonged to a neighborhood cafe'?

I'll go 8 to 1 that we are listening to many, many more of the latter than the former.

138 posted on 12/29/2005 2:24:40 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul

Regarding your scenario: Given the threat we face, given that we've already been attacked, I'd support the government monitoring that conversation. During WWII no one would have objected to the monitoring of, say, telegrams between American citizens and "words only" Nazi supporters in Switzerland.

During war, it's important to find out who your enemies are. Someone who speaks out in favor of terrorist acts should certainly be listened in on.


171 posted on 12/29/2005 6:50:58 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson