[Antonello]

nope. if the deacon in the article is right, they wouldn't need to go to war, the keeper could just wheel it out to the front line and anyone that came up would be zotted.

How would that:

a) Not still be a war
-and-
b) Remove the Ark from being a reason for the war?

[Pharmboy]

Ping...

[absolootezer0]

How would that:

a) Not still be a war
-and-
b) Remove the Ark from being a reason for the war?


it would seem to me more likely to be a slaughter rather than a war. there wouldn't really be any fighting. and it sounded more like the war would be over the land the ark rests in, not over the ark itself.
altho, many countries and groups would probably happily goto war to get it for themselves. though i would bet any army except one led by israeli rabbis/ priests would meet the same fate the deacon threatens.