To: ndt
"Given the argument put forward by the DOJ it would appear that they are defending the warrantless tapping of U.S. Persons, so I would assume that is what they did/do."
Sorry, this part confused me, you assume they "did/do" what?
415 posted on
12/27/2005 8:54:54 PM PST by
amutr22
(....not ANOTHER clinton!)
To: amutr22
"Sorry, this part confused me, you assume they "did/do" what?"
The DOJ, in their defense of the spying, is putting forth arguments that would defend the spying on of U.S.Persons. I would assume that is an admission that they do in fact spy on U.S. Persons, if they did not, there would be no reason to defend it.
418 posted on
12/27/2005 9:00:12 PM PST by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson