To: Wasanother
"You are right, I have asked at least 4 times on this thread for someone to provide case law for the argument that the President,"broke the law""
Sorry about that, I had so many threads going a the same time I finally just said hell with it and went to dinner :)
As for case law, the 4th amendment is the basis of all following case law regarding the subject. Therefore the question is what case law allows the president to violate the 4th?
I'll give you a hint, I've gone through the cases cited by the AG and his case is weak. I'll be happy to address any part of his apology, but be specific, I'm not going to write a 20 page rebuttal.
406 posted on
12/27/2005 8:39:45 PM PST by
ndt
To: ndt
So, if you are correct, why is it not being presented by anyone that this clearly was illegal?
408 posted on
12/27/2005 8:42:20 PM PST by
amutr22
(....not ANOTHER clinton!)
To: ndt
I'm not asking for your rebuttal, just case law rebuttal to any part of the AG's case law claims.
410 posted on
12/27/2005 8:45:40 PM PST by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson