Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
You're saying that he didn't break the law, yet at the same time justifying his actions by inisting that the law was inadequate to our needs.

I hate to break in when you're enjoying yourself but the two are not mutually exclusive since the CIC does have inherent powers but one of those powers is not making laws.

404 posted on 12/27/2005 8:36:58 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
If they're not mutually exclusive, then they come pretty darn close. If you're defending someone for taking a certain action, what's the point of saying that the law was inadequate to the situation he was facing, if you're not tacitly acknowledging that he went outside the law?
411 posted on 12/27/2005 8:49:11 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson