Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rakkasan1

Lincoln wanted to set an example. He didn't want to contend with a Civil War and an Indian uprising simultaneously. It worked.


2 posted on 12/27/2005 9:11:14 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Uh, the sad truth, they were hanged for participating in an uprising, against an invading enemy.

The Indians never fought the White man except, on their own soil, in their own country, only then did they resist the invader, the United States was that invader.

Lincoln sanctioned the ongoing genocide of nations, tribes and people, in short, men, women and children were robbed, starved and slaughtered, all under the auspices of the stars and stripes.


8 posted on 12/27/2005 9:39:51 AM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson