To: NicknamedBob
Wait'll you see what I'm working on next. Ever wonder what'd happen if you "convinced" the entangled virtual partical pairs along a demarcated line that they were actually all anti-particals? Then had them interact with real-space particals already extant inside a mass the size of an asteroid?
Test cases show they should just kinda fall apart along the seam. Of course, energy requirements are phenomenal. We'd need to dedicate a significate portion of our reactor output to the task. Think of it as a "Death Star Superlaser" that doesn't actually blow anything into tiny pieces. Just Ginsu's them.
1,219 posted on
01/03/2006 1:39:37 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
To: Dead Corpse; Darksheare; Tax-chick; tuliptree76; NicknamedBob; All
Hi, Kids!
Walp...I'm not leaving until Thursday morning, so you have another day to put up with me. *snort*
1,220 posted on
01/03/2006 2:06:13 PM PST by
Monkey Face
(Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface.)
To: Dead Corpse
Does that require laser input, or electrical?
We can supply either one, but I was thinking the elegance of several hundred laser beams coalescing into a Jedi-like "light saber" would be awesome!
We've seen similar collected beams in "Independence Day" and on the Death Star.
1,226 posted on
01/03/2006 2:16:23 PM PST by
NicknamedBob
(How can I compete in a world of Cat 5 and wireless when my brain is wired by knob and tube?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson