Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Charles may change name to George
Times of London ^ | 12/24/2005 | Andrew Pierce

Posted on 12/25/2005 12:31:52 PM PST by Neville72

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 last
To: Neville72

That'd be an insult to his Grandad.

And he'll still have big ears and look funny.


141 posted on 12/25/2005 6:53:49 PM PST by Professional Engineer (FRiends don't let FRiends drink Darksheare's coffee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

....Charles and Pope Benedict are no better nor worse than us "subjects." Just because you are born into office or appointed by a group of guys in dresses doesn't mean you deserve to be bowed to....>>>

No. In the latter case it has to do with the fact that you are the direct and legitimate Heir to Peter and the Vicar of Christ, our one connection with the Risen Lord.

Compared to that, the German kings of England are a joke.


142 posted on 12/25/2005 6:59:32 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: x

Actually Charles should take up painting, then abandon it, so he can become the Prince Formerly Known as "Artist."


143 posted on 12/25/2005 7:00:44 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar

Sad? I think it's great. George has actually fully morphed into a male. Ugly, true, but undeniably male.


144 posted on 12/25/2005 7:01:58 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

LOL... agree. I don't really think Charles will ever be king!


145 posted on 12/25/2005 7:05:12 PM PST by republican4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

You seem to be upset with your cousins, here...

?


146 posted on 12/25/2005 7:05:16 PM PST by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

That reminds me of the following item that I saw earlier today:

Mordechai Vanunu, who was released from prison 20 months ago, after serving 18 years for giving away Israel's nuclear secrets, has changed his name to Johnny Carson.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=95436

The Prince of Wales has to avoid unhappy associations with some of the bloodiest periods in the monarchy’s history. “The name Charles is tinged with so much sadness.”

This is the time of year for name changes, just before yearend.


147 posted on 12/25/2005 7:26:06 PM PST by Jack_1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

LOL! You're bad!


148 posted on 12/25/2005 7:32:34 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel

You have NO idea. :0)


149 posted on 12/25/2005 7:55:07 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC; Thinkin' Gal

How about the Super Plus King? That would be a good 'fit'.


150 posted on 12/25/2005 8:39:20 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com

"How about changing your name to King Freeloader?

What makes these people so much better then the common folk who reward them with the taxpayers riches? The Brits should wise up and throw this freeloading family out on their asses!"

You might want to do some homework. When I last read on the matter, the Royal Family actually paid in to the government more than they took out. Also, much of the tax money spent for the upkeep of historic palaces and other costs related to the functions of a Head of State would still be spent even if the UK were a republic.

And The Prince of Wales does not get much, if any government money. His income comes from the Duchy of Cornwall, a collection of businesses and properties maintained to provide an independent income for the heir to the throne. He also pays a hefty tax on that money.

He has been in overall control of the Duchy since the seventies (government officials manage the Duchy when there is no Prince of Wales or if he is a minor) and has kept it profitable and has used it's income to fund many charitable organizations, most notably, the Prince's Trust.

http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/

The Prince of Wales has made a lot of public mistakes and like a lot of other baby boomers is probably too socially liberal, but he has the makings of a good King for his future realms, not probably a great King, but a good King.


151 posted on 12/25/2005 8:50:25 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (11-4 AFC North Champs!!! Who Dey! Who Dey! Who Dey Think Gonna Beat Dem Bengals!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

He was a prince too long. The fruit's been on the tree too long; and there's a new crop.


152 posted on 12/25/2005 9:24:16 PM PST by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
I'm not qualified to comment on the benefits or detriments of a British Monarchy (nor do I really care) but I am 100% sure that I agree with your sentiments

>>>"I'm strongly biased against certain Americans. Two Massachusetts senators, for instance"<<<

I hold the same bias against the "The Massachusetts Monarchy"

TT
153 posted on 12/26/2005 6:11:22 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He probably would, but the British rules of succession require that in order for William to become King, Charles would have to voluntarily abdicate the throne, IIRC.


154 posted on 01/10/2006 9:57:41 AM PST by RockinRight (The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

Perhaps I missed it, but I don't get the tampon joke. Aside from it being funny and oddly fitting...


155 posted on 01/10/2006 10:08:18 AM PST by RockinRight (The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson